Friday, December 25, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Romantic Language in Hymns (Pt. 2)
Just One Touch of You, Dear Lord
1.
Just one touch of You, dear Lord,
Just one look into Your eyes,
Just one kiss from You,
You're all I need, my Love.
Let me hear again Your voice.
You are now my final choice.
Speak in love to me.
I'll waste myself on Thee.
Chorus 1:
Nothing and no one can satisfy me
But You anymore.
Jesus, I love You, my only desire!
O Lord, I just love You.
2. Let me touch You as before,
Craving for You more and more,
You're the very best!
I'll drop the rest for You.
Oh, the kisses of Your mouth
Make my lips to praise and shout.
Lord, You're full of grace,
Oh, what a taste, my Love!
Chorus 2:
Nothing and no one can satisfy me
But You anymore.
Jesus, my first Love, oh, set me on fire
For You, my only desire.
3. Just infuse me with Your eyes.
Oh! This union satisfies!
As I gaze on You,
I'm filled with You, my Love.
Only You alone will do.
I can't make it without You.
Keep me close to You,
Just joined to You as one.
Chorus 3:
Nothing and no one can satisfy me
But You anymore.
Jesus, I love You, my only desire.
Oh, set my heart on fire.
4. I repent and now return,
Grant my heart for You to burn.
Flame in me this zeal.
Lord, be in me so real!
I repent and now return.
Grant my heart for You to burn.
Flame in me this zeal.
Lord, be in me so real!
Chorus 4:
Jesus, my first Love! O Jesus, my best Love!
I now return to You.
Jesus, my first Love! O Jesus, my best Love!
I love You. I just love You!
Romantic Language in Hymns (Pt. 1)
With the Kisses of Your Mouth
1. With the kisses of Your mouth,
Have You kissed me, Lord.
From Your kisses flows a fountain,
From a depth unknown.
Gently tempered by Your touching
Of my deepest chords,
My heart’s renewed with gladness,
And my love o’erflows.
2. Let me kiss You, drink You deeper,
Fully satisfy
All the longings deep within me,
For Your presence nigh,
And a deeper, sweeter union,
Of Your life with mine
That our natures fully mingled,
Would our hearts entwine.
3. Ever increase,Lord, within me,
My desire for You.
Let Your kisses ever kiss me,
And that I’d kiss You.
Dear Lord Jesus, may I ever be,
So betrothed to You.
May I love You, always love You,
And respond to You.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Video of Church Raid
From "Voice of the Martyrs":
Just as we put the finishing touches on our November newsletter about Vietnam, we received this video footage of a small house church being raided by Vietnamese police. This church had been raided before. Local officials told the house church they did not have official permission to meet, so they could not have religious meetings.
Church members reported:
On Sunday, August 23, 2009, we were still gathering together for service meeting since this is necessary spiritual need. At 3 p.m., many district security officers came into my house. At that time, we were having service meeting, they came and stopped and dismissed us. We stopped and explained to them we had made the application of permission already, but they still blustered. Several of them towed Brother --- out to the house and had him sit on their motorbike. They did the same way to ---. They oppressed him ruthlessly and towed him; they did not allow for him to speak a word. And other women were towed away also. They did take away one guitar but they did not make a report to taking away guitar. After arriving at the district police station, they made the report with the accusation: “They are gathering together illegally.” They used the abuse words and threatened Brother ---: “If you came back this place again; you will be beaten.” … and at 6:30 p.m. they released us.
See video footage of the raid here. Continue to pray that our Vietnamese family will not succumb to the pressure against them. Pray they will continue to meet together and encourage each other, so they can continue to share the good news of Jesus Christ.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Excerpts from a Book (pt. 3)
Each of us has contact with hundreds of people who never look beyond our surface appearance. We have dealings with hundreds of people who the moment they set eyes on us begin calculating what use we can be to them, what they can get out of us. We meet hundreds of people who take one look at us, make a snap judgment, and then slot us into a category so that they won't have to deal with us as persons. The treat us as something less than we are; and if we're in constant association with them, we become less.
And then someone enters our life who isn't looking for someone to use, is leisurely enough to find out what's really going on in us, is secure enough not to exploit our weaknesses or attact our strengths, recognizes our inner life and understands the difficulty of living out our inner convictions, confirms what's deepest within us. A friend."
Leap Over a Wall: Earthy Spirituality for Everyday Christians - Eugene Peterson
Excerpts from a Book (pt. 2)
In the process of this exploration we learn that there's more to the world than size and shape, color and texture; there's meaning and purpose, good and bad. There's someting just beneath the surface of everything, something invisible and inaudible but just as real, maybe even more real, than what we're seeing and hearing and touching. Stories are our primary means for exploring these beneath-the-surface, behind-the-scenes relalities that are as present and immediate to us as anything we have access to through our five senses. Stories are as important as toys."
Leap Over a Wall: Earthy Spirituality for Everyday Christians - Eugene Peterson
Sunday, November 15, 2009
A Word to Bible College Students and Graduates
Friday, November 13, 2009
My Paper for Class
-----
The Divine Design: Gender, Marriage, and Authority
Few issues have consistently sparked as much controversy over the course of human history as has the topic of human gender rights, roles, and responsibilities. Hesiod, a Greek poet and foundational source of Greek mythology, gracefully recorded his two cents worth concerning the matter when he wrote, “Trust a woman – you might as well trust a thief” (Theogony 375). In more recent history, famed author and journalist Rebecca West wrote, “I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute.” (219). Indeed, such matters that flow from the heart of human sexuality and relationships are of pressing concern - especially in the 21st century world of sex-saturated media, growing global divorce rates,1 and the rising popularity of so-called gay marriage.
The topic of gender roles was addressed heavily, yet in my opinion insufficiently, in the first week of class and in more roundabout ways in the ensuing weeks. Therefore, I would primarily like to explain more fully my understanding of YHWH’s design for the male and female marriage relationship as established before the fall of man in Genesis 3.2 Included in this explanation, I will contrast YHWH’s and Zeus’s motives for creating the genders; and I will juxtapose Genesis’s outlook on gender equality with Aeschylus’s depiction as presented in The Oresteia.
The Bible makes it clear that the creation of the first male and female was “exceedingly good” in YHWH’s eyes and that the purpose of the woman was to be man’s helper (The Five Books of Moses, Gen. 1.31; 2.18). This stands in shocking contrast to Hesiod’s account of the creation of the first woman. In his Theogony, Hesiod speaks of woman as being “an evil for men” (45). He speaks again of this mythical event in Works and Days when Zeus says, “I too will give them a gift, an evil one…in which all will delight in their hearts, as they embrace their own evil” (73). Whereas YHWH creates the woman to be a helper to the man, Zeus creates the female as a punishment to the male.
Not only does Genesis record the creation of male and female as being “exceedingly good,” it also implies an equality of essence as manifest through the fact that male and female are uniquely and equally created in the image of God (Gen. 1.26-27, 31).3 Consequentially, neither gender is to be celebrated as intrinsically better. This equality differs greatly from the explicit favoritism shown toward the male gender in The Oresteia. One such example is found when Clytemnstra announces the victorious end of the war in the beginning of Agamemnon. Whereas she claims that in her boldness and honesty she “speaks as a woman,” the chorus responds with the compliment, “She speaks like a man.” (Hughes 22). The attributes considered virtuous in the text continue to be identified as masculine throughout the trilogy.
In addition to these similarities, the Genesis account presents clear distinctions between YHWH’s intended purposes for the two genders – specifically as it pertains to the marriage relationship. As stated in the previous paragraph, these distinctions do not serve to present one gender has being superior to the other but rather to present the genders as necessary4 compliments for one another.
One primary distinction worth addressing is the headship5 of Adam within the marriage relationship. This is evidenced in the text both before and after sin entered the world. First, Adam is said to have named Eve (Gen. 2.23). Regarding this point Wayne Grudem says, “The original readers of Genesis and of the rest of the Old Testament would have been familiar with this pattern, a pattern whereby people who have authority over another person or thing have the ability to assign a name to that person or thing, a name that often indicates something of the character or quality of the person” (28). It is important to point out that this act of authority happened before Adam and Eve had sinned.
A second evidence of Adam’s headship in the marriage was his accountability before YHWH for the moral behavior of both him and his wife, Eve. The Genesis account makes it clear that even though Eve was the first person to transgress the law of YHWH by eating fruit from the Tree of the Knowing of Good and Evil, Adam was the first person confronted by YHWH about the sin (Gen. 2.16-17; 3.6; 3.9). If there was not an elevated status of moral responsibility for Adam within his marriage to Eve, one would find it peculiar that YHWH initially confronted only Adam about the sin (Gen. 3:9-11). Moreover, the entire account of the fall of man demonstrates an inversion of the divine design for authority in that an animal addressed only the woman, who then proceeded to address the present, yet passive, Adam (Gen. 3:1-6). This progression is juxtaposed with the account of YHWH’s confrontation of the man, woman, and serpent regarding the sin. YHWH here addressed the man first, the woman second, and the serpent third (Gen. 3:9-14).
Lastly, an important part of the curse placed on mankind in Genesis 3:16 involved a sinful inclination of both genders to both pervert6 and invert their God-ordained relationship roles. As a result of sin, Eve now possessed a natural desire to rule7 in her relationship with Adam, while Adam was now naturally inclined to be passive in his involvement and abusive in his headship through physical domination. A relevant objection to this point would be that the consequences of the curse don’t require the pre-fall headship of Adam. I would agree with this objection and echo the words of Wayne Grudem when he says, “…Genesis 3:16 should never be used as a direct argument for male headship in marriage” (35). I am not intending to use the curse to independently establish Adam’s headship in marriage, but rather to make it most clear that a dramatic shift towards relational conflict happened as a result of the fall. Consequentially, I would argue that the first three points (naming, moral accountability, and dialogue progression) establish what the previous roles had been; and that in partnership with those points, the consequences of the curse assist in presenting a strong argument for the pre-fall and post-fall headship of Adam in his marriage relationship with Eve that would have been understood by the Hebrew people.
Based upon this brief surveying the depictions of gender as presented in Genesis, The Oresteia, Theogony, and Works and Days, it is safe to say that, of the four works, Genesis provides women with the highest degree of dignity and value. Therefore, in a world characterized in large part by the objectifying and devaluing of women, it is imperative that those who submit themselves to the authority of the Bible put forth great effort in preserving this dignity and value and showcasing it to an unbelieving world.
Notes:
1 http://www.womenofchina.cn/focus/marriage_and_family/5166.jsp.
2 Because of the limited length of this paper, this explanation will be far from exhaustive in its support of this argument. Hopefully, however, it will be sufficient in presenting a solid case.
3 The creation of mankind is unique from the rest of creation. Its uniqueness is expressed literarily in various ways. One such way is seen in Genesis 1:26 when God says, “Let us make…” when referring to mankind (Ware 72). For all other created things God said, “Let there be.” Both the creation process and the product are seen as unique.
4 I include the word “necessary” in an effort to emphasize YHWH’s recognition that “it is not good for the human to be alone” (Gen. 2.18).
5 Although this exact term, “headship,” is not used in the Genesis account, for sake of consistency and for lack of a better word, I will use the term “headship” when referring to Adam’s authoritave role in his marriage with Eve.
6 Grudem’s comments regarding this point were helpful when he said, “…Genesis 3:16 should never be used as a direct argument for male headship in marriage. But it does show us that the Fall brought about a distortion of previous roles, not the introduction of new roles. The distortion was that Eve would now rebel against her husband’s authority, and Adam would misuse that authority to rule forcefully and even harshly over Eve.” (35).
7 In order to best understand the meaning of the Hebrew word for “lust” in Geneis 3:16, one must look to Genesis 4:7 where the word is also used. In Geneis 4:7 the text speaks of sin’s “lust” to control Kayin. It can be assumed, then, the word “lust” does not speak of the sinfulness of a wife’s sexual desire for her husband, but rather a desire to “rule” or “dominate” in her relationship with him.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Letter from Prison
I read this on Kevin DeYoung's blog today. Great stuff.
---
This is a portion of the letter Guido de Bres, the author of the Belgic Confession, wrote to his wife while he was imprisoned in the Black Hole of Brunain for his Protestant faith.
My dear and well-beloved wife in our Lord Jesus, Your grief and anguish are the cause of my writing you this letter. I most earnestly pray you not to be grieved beyond measure…We knew when we married that we might not have many years together, and the Lord has graciously given us seven. If the Lord had wished us to live together longer, he could easily have cause it to be so. But such was not his pleasure. Let his good will be done….Moreover, consider that I have not fallen into the hands of my enemies by chance, but by the providence of God….All these considerations have made my heart glad and peaceful, and I pray you, my dear and faithful companion, to be glad with me, and to thank the good God for what he is going, for he does nothing but what is altogether good and right…I pray you then to be comforted in the Lord, to commit yourself and your affairs to him, he is the husband of the widow and the father of the fatherless, and he will never leave you nor forsake you.
On May 31, 1567, Guido de Bres, 47 years old, was publicly hanged in the market square of Valenciennes. He was pushed off the scaffold as he exhorted the crowd to be faithful to Scripture and respectful to the magistrates. His body was buried in a shallow grave where it was later dug up and torn apart by wild animals.
I thank God for de Bres’ example of courage and steadfastness. Here is another man “of whom the world was not worthy” (Heb. 11:38). I’m thankful too for the Belgic Confession. And whenever I read this heartwrenching and inspiring letter, I’m thankful he wrote to his wife in prison.
Long Overdue
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Churchill "Miles"
Friday, November 6, 2009
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Excerpts from a Book (pt. 1)

Friday, October 30, 2009
First US Official to Resign Over Afgan War
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Let Loose Your Inner Nerd
Tim Keller @ Google
Tim Keller's New Book
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Here's My Week in 60 Seconds


Thursday, October 22, 2009
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Picking Up Steam
Friday, October 16, 2009
Jesus in "The Washington Post"
No 'Best Case' Way to Present God, but Many False Ways
Q: What makes the best 'case for God' to a skeptic or non-believer, an open-minded seeker, and to a person of faith and Why?
Answer
Jesus.
Christianity is not first and foremost about a sacred place to pilgrimage to, a philosophical system to ponder, a moral code to live, a religious tradition to honor, or an impersonal god to experience. Rather, Christianity is about a person who claimed to be the only God and said he would prove his unprecedented claim by living without sin, dying for sinners, and conquering death through resurrection.
So, as Christians, our aim is not to convince people of some god in general, but to introduce them to Jesus in particular. And since he created us with the ability to communicate, think, love, and experience, Christians have always valued using every means by which the truth and love of Jesus can be revealed.
Helpful to this end is using the evidence for a personal Creator who handcrafted our world for human life by explaining the principles of intelligent design and such things as the fine-tuning argument and the argument for irreducible complexity. These show that our world is a gift to be enjoyed worshipfully and stewarded wisely.
It is also important that people learn to understand how God speaks uniquely and authoritatively through the Bible. Acts that can aid in this include giving away Bibles (along with helpful Christian books) as gifts for people to simply read, bringing people to church to listen to the Bible preached, inviting people to small groups and classes to ask their questions about the Bible, and recommending good podcasts that would bring the Bible into the daily rhythm of their commutes, exercise workouts, and the like.
On a more practical level, acts of truly selfless compassion--done not for fame, notoriety, or to merit God's approval, but done out of love for someone--help to reveal a small measure of God's loving, merciful, compassionate nature. In a world where people use one another far more frequently than they love one another, these kinds of acts can be signs pointing to the God who is altogether good. As one example, in our church filled mainly with young people, we have put much effort into weeping with and serving the hundreds and hundreds of victims of molestation and rape.
Thus, informing the mind about Scripture, explaining the world and our place in it under God, and extending a hand of loving compassion all help to give people a framework by which to interpret their life experiences. They can begin to see that God has made them, wants to speak with them, and desires restored relationship with them, relationship that otherwise remains broken through sin.
While each of these ways of informing someone's understanding is important, none is alone sufficient. That is because what they leave us with is knowledge about God by revealing what he has done (creation), how he communicates (the Bible), and what he seeks (relationship). But we still do not enjoy that relationship.
This leads us to Jesus.
Christianity has always held, based upon the teachings of Jesus and the prophets of the Old Testament and apostles of the New Testament, that in Jesus, the Creator has entered into creation on a rescue mission for the restoring of relationship, in fulfillment of Scripture. For making the three most unprecedented claims in the history of the world--that he was without sin as the only God and the only path to salvation--Jesus was treated without compassion. He was lied about, arrested, falsely tried, beaten, whipped beyond recognition, nailed to a cross, and lifted up for a crowd to mock, jeer, and spit upon. Jesus our Creator then, with bloodied lips, spoke the word "forgive" for his murderers. Jesus died to pay the penalty for sin as the greatest act of compassion the world has or will ever
witness; the Creator died for his creation, to make enemies friends.
Three days later, Jesus rose, conquering sin and death and vindicating his claims. Subsequently, if Jesus is dead, so is Christianity. If Jesus is alive, so is Christianity. And so while there is no "best case" for presenting God, there are false ways of presenting God: as anyone in addition to or other than Jesus Christ. As Christians, our goal is never to lie to people by only telling them what they want to hear, or manipulating them to feel what they want to feel. Instead, we want to respect them enough to tell them the truth, and love them enough to do so in a way that is compassionate. We care more about the truth and the love than having the "best case." We believe that there is power in the truth about Jesus that can unleash new life in people as they agree with the truth about him.
- article by Pastor Mark Driscoll

Sunday, October 11, 2009
A Helpful Interview
A Lazy Sunday Afternoon
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Officially Settled In
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Cops, Robbers, and the DMV
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Denver. One Month After Arrival.
Saturday, September 5, 2009
The Inevitable
Sunday, August 30, 2009
The Weekend
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Meese: Forward Motion
Meese - 'Forward Motion' - Director Rod Blackhurst from Rod Blackhurst on Vimeo.
My Week: Structured Numerically (A.k.a. Home Alone and Temporarily Sick of Homework)
Friday, August 21, 2009
My Exciting Life
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Better Late Than Never
My parents came out for the farewell weekend and stayed until Wednesday morning. We spent Monday packing up the remainder of my belongings from the Rudd’s house and cleaning out my office. Believe it or not, we were able to fit everything into my Civic and the trunk and back seat of my parents’ Buick.
On Tuesday my parents and I went on the tour of the Ford plant in Dearborne. The tour was pretty fascinating and included my first experience with a 3D theatre. We sat in a room on swivel chairs with screens on all sides of us. During the video, the action would happen in all directions and even the temperature in the room would heat up during the boiler room scenes! Like I said, it was pretty fascinating.
My parents and I also met a guy (read: Ford Nut) who was touring the plant for the first time while he was in town on business. Guess where he was from. You guessed it, Denver, Colorado. We (read: He) chatted for a while about the new Ford Raptor truck and then gave me his business card. I’m gonna give him a call one of these days just to let him know I have officially arrived in Denver and have every intention of taking over the whole city.
After leaving Detroit on Wednesday I stopped by Perry, MI to visit my friends Bob and Charissa Karr. They got married last summer. I was in their wedding. I wore a tux. A black one. I think I look good in black. At least I did last summer.
Thursday morning I arrived in Grand Rapids for my friend Eric’s wedding. It was also Jessica’s wedding, but I don’t know her as well so I will here refer to it simply as Eric’s wedding. A bunch of us in the wedding party played badminton, went tubing, and jumped on the diving boards on a floating dock out on the lake. It, the dock, was covered in bird poo. I think they should put a fake owl out there to war against the lesser birds.
Thursday night was the bachelor party. My friend, and Eric’s best man, Mike, had made a video that gave Eric various challenges to accomplish in order to pass the over threshold into manhood land. Some of the activities included drinking 12 Mountain Dews over the course of the night, swimming a lap in a public fountain, and taking a dip in a stranger’s pool.
On Friday the wedding party guys went golfing. Most of us stunk, but it was a great time of male bonding. Friday night was the wedding rehearsal and rehearsal dinner. It was fun seeing Eric and Jessica’s friends from across the country have a great time hanging out together like old friends. One girl, Bethany, was nuts. She straight up barehanded her entire piece of cake into her mouth in an effort to win her self-initiated, “Let’s see who can eat their dessert the fastest!” contest. I think she started laughing so hard that she didn’t even win...although I’m not sure she had any competitors to begin with.
The wedding was great on Saturday. We did the wedding thing and then went for a ride in a limo to get pictures taken downtown and then got back in the limo to ride to the golf course for more pictures and the reception. Each of the couples in the wedding party got a golf cart to drive around in to the various photo locations. It’s a good thing the golf carts didn’t go very fast and that we were held financially responsible for any damages done to the carts or else there would have been a greater degree of mayhem than what actually occured (Read: Zach intentionally went full speed through every puddle and mud hole on the course).
Sunday morning Mike, his brother Ryan, our friend Greg, and myself hopped in Greg and my cars and drove to Iowa stopping overnight as my house on our way to Colorado.
For sake of length, this post has assumed the status of: To Be Continued.